1. Welcome to the MGN forums! Login or create an account to begin interacting with your fellow gamers!
    排除公告
  2. 排除公告
排除公告
訪客 Did you notice the AWESOME new button on the top bar! We're giving you Free Games just for being an active partner with us! How cool is that?

Low Latency or Less Buffering?

本帖由 BatchGaming05 18, 2016 發佈。版塊名稱:YouTube Discussions

?

Which is the best option to live stream on YouTube Gaming?

投票將於 06 1, 2016 關閉。
  1. Low Latency (Optimised for interaction)

    33.3%
  2. Less Buffering

    66.7%
  1. BatchGaming

    BatchGaming ★ Level 4: Gamer

    註冊日期:
    03 7, 2016
    文章:
    21
    支持:
    3
    I always thought low latency which is optimised for viewer interaction would be the best option when streaming to YouTube Gaming. However, this comes at a cost of buffering more.

    What option, when you create your event on Live Streams, do you go for? Does the less buffering help pull more viewers in / retain viewers?
     
  2. BabyHead Gaming

    BabyHead Gaming ★ Level 5: Hero

    註冊日期:
    01 26, 2016
    文章:
    31
    支持:
    9
    Well depends what game you play , if Heathstone or any borad game you get away with social interactions but if you playing fps shooters and you wanna crack down the fps to least 30 as it will be a buffing nightmare :D
     
  3. VMANCOOL

    VMANCOOL ★ Level 7: Champion

    註冊日期:
    04 1, 2016
    文章:
    122
    支持:
    16
    Less buffering To Make The Livestream A lot Smoother
     
  4. BatchGaming

    BatchGaming ★ Level 4: Gamer

    註冊日期:
    03 7, 2016
    文章:
    21
    支持:
    3
    Thanks both for the advice. I probably could have done this earlier and got more in viewers staying and subbing etc. using the Less Buffering option. Will plan to use this in future then. Was given advice by one person to use Less Latency when I started.
     
  5. VMANCOOL

    VMANCOOL ★ Level 7: Champion

    註冊日期:
    04 1, 2016
    文章:
    122
    支持:
    16
    AWESOME
     

分享此頁面